In sport its the fighter that train's the hardest and puts the effort in his art. One guy. training 2 a week in muay thai drinks and smokes on nights out vs a guy who train's 4 nights a week in karate and does not drink or smoke who wins IT'S NOT THE ART THATS IMPORTANT BUT THE ARITIST.

Yes it's the fighter.

And yes boxers can fight a smart fight.

There are many ways to "win" and there are many ease to lose. Those depend on the fight and what the goal is. In competition it's scoring more points or a knock out. On the streets it's more complex, it could be simply avoiding the fight, ending an attack, or roughing someone up, (hopefully killing someone wouldn't be necessary but it's issuable)

Yes the martial art is entirely irrelevant. It not only depends on the fighter, but their experience, skill, and quality of instructor.

Yes, it depends on the fighter.

Entirely on the fighter. No style is better than the other

Finally SOMEONE GETS IT!

Yes it depends on da fighter

go back and start watching ufc 1

u must be good at all 3 phases of fighting

stand up clinch and ground

Like say a black belt at TKD vs a black belt at kung fu would winning depend on the fighter, what a bout a boxer who relys on reflex vs a karte blackbelt who hqs a brain and plans his fight and is one move a head, so would this statement be true, it dosnt depend on the martial art it depents on on the fighter