I want it to be in tokyo!:D it would be awesome
Of the three candidates, Istanbul is the one in a country which has never hosted an Olympics, so I would back them. I don't think the Spanish economy is in a fit state to have it in Madrid (and they have had one in Barcelona), and Tokyo have had one before (1964)
The Olympics are an enormous dran on that country's economy and taxpayers. Countless billions are spent hosting a two-week long party. The tourism and media revenue usually doesn't come close to recovering the massive financial outlay that a country needs to make to host the games.
A country that is swimming in money, has low taxation rates, low unemployment rates, and a low deficit or balanced budget is who should host the games - if they want to host the games.
Istanbul. It's time to embrace the Arab/Muslim/whatever world, and at present Turkey is the only country rich enough and secular enough to accommodate the Games.
In reality, the first 'Arab Olympics' will probably go to some God-awful speck of obscene oil wealth in the Persian Gulf.
Japan would be good, but so would Spain. It is rumored that it will be in Africa, but I hope not for the athlete's sake since it is going to be too hot.
Istanbul: a place which has been a meeting point of cultures for thousands of years.
Istanbul because I do not remember them having one in quite a while. Although I am not that old...
I would say london but since we just had it
Spain or holland
Istanbul, I guess.
USA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i think japan you?..
