Like Meth has stated, If a situation does happen like that, i'd say they'd give the Brownlow Medal to the 2nd placed Player.
If Watson was stripped of his brownlow, then the joint winners would be Cotchin and Mitchell who were equal runners up, providing they have nothing to answer in all this crap.
Assuming Cotchin and Mitchell are clean, they'd be awarded it retrospectively. And Q, yes that's right, only the premierships were taken. All individual awards were left alone.
Not actually sure - it's a little like my wooden spoon question hey? I'd be really surprised though if Jobe lost his Brownlow, they would need direct evidence the he was involved personally. Personally I hope he doesn't lose the Brownlow because he has actually been a very good and fair player. His style of play has little to do with sheer bulk or strength. In NRL when they stripped the premierships off the Storm I don't think they interfered with any of the medals. Different situation (salary cap) but could be an indicator of the types of things they might do.
The same would apply to Hird and Woewoden. They could always give lance Armstrong a phone call.
Not sure, what happened with the Tour de France, did second place win or not?
Duh! You give it to the next best (and cleanest) vote getter (which at this rate means you could end up awarding it to a rookie).
No, because Jobe Watson will not be stripped of his Brownlow, he has done nothing wrong, neither have any of the Essendon players, they have done nothing wrong, and this is not a scandal.
