He seems out of touch and not up to the fibey aspects of today's game. David king knows his stuff and it was pathetic to see macclure play devils advocate to most of kings accurate and concise opinions and general sport knowledge.. Why is maclure even allowed on the show?This buffoon ruining gerards credibility...He seems out of touch and not up to the fibey aspects of today's game. David king knows his stuff and it was pathetic to see macclure play devils advocate to most of kings accurate and concise opinions and general sport knowledge.. Why is maclure even allowed on the show?This buffoon ruining gerards credibility...

He doesn't do a lot for me, he's not bad on the ABC but as for TV well lets just say he has a good head for radio, got to agree with Shift as far as Murphy and Sewell are concerned , almost bordering on embarrassing the soft **** crap they come out with. Don't mind King as an analyst, he one of the best going around not that it's a Melbourne Cup field of contenders, but he goes OK

This question is just as bad as why do AFL 360 have the other guests on the show such as Robert Murphy,Brad Sewell, Rodney Eade, Mark (bomber) Thompson &lets not forget fight night with Cam Mooney &Barry Hall. David King is a very astute man who knows how to market himself. being a Port Melbourne boy i can understand that. not keen on his war room assessments though but that's a personal thing. but Mark Maclure is a bit hit &miss with his assessments on the game. that is for sure. but he does have friends in high places. most of his input does come from the media itself not factual sources. so you will have to give him some leeway in that respect. Personally i don't mind him being on the show being an ex Carlton player. even though some may not agree with him. Cheers.