not while a brilliant player constantly stands out in a weak side. Pendlebury is in the situation where too many players from his own side continually poll well in brownlow votes.
Pendlebury is good enough to win a brownlow, there no doubt about that . The final result depends simply on the umpires, its their choice ! One brownlow night when you least expect, he could win the medal, and due to his consistency there is no reason why it can't be 2013 !
Don't think he will, he isn't the sort of dude spotted by the umpires (which are the ones casting the votes) That being said I, among others, rate him among the best players in the competition. BQ: Joel Selwood ties with Gary Ablett
I would say if Swan plays forward more next year he will win it in the next few years but you can never judge how players are voted for. Ablett will surely win it. He is by far the most deserving.
Well I really hope he does. Along with Ablett and J Selwood he is a class above the rest of the competition. I really believe he is a better player than Swan because he is the one who receives the tag every week because he is the one who has the potential to rip apart the opposition teams (as we have seen on many occasions). Swan tends to just accumulate the uncontested ball while pendels gets the hard contested ball. No doubt Swan is a fantastic player, I just think pendels is better... Brownlow prediction this year: Two horse race between Ablett and Selwood. Pendels really should right up there but unfortunately I don't think he will be... :( Btw I go for Port so completely unbiased opinion here :P
Pendles no chance. Gaz this year + next
If swan didnt get so much ball he might
