it is unfair to some players for example barry sanders who i belive is the goat had a terrible team so he never won a ring and that goes against him also lebron for example in clevland never won because his team was him and thats it even micheal jordan coudent win without a team i just belive it should be about indiviual statsit is unfair to some players for example barry sanders who i belive is the goat had a terrible team so he never won a ring and that goes against him also lebron for example in clevland never won because his team was him and thats it even micheal jordan coudent win without a team i just belive it should be about indiviual stats

When players are judged on championships, I'm sure that their teams at the time are taken into account.... You say "I just believe it should be about individual stats." Unfortunately for that ideology, it's a team sport.

I believe that comparing someone because of rings is some BS. Like if you say someone is the goat because of rings then that means that Bill Russell was better then Jordan because it's 11 to 6 rings. That is BS. However you can define someones legacy on how many championships they won. Shows how dominant they were. But for Barry Sanders it's a different story because 1 person can't change a WHOLE football team